Skip to content
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
  • Home
  • Projects
    • LeaDing Fellows-MSCA ECOSCI
    • Bibliometría o Barbarie
    • SCI-COMM COVID-19
  • Research topics
    • Altmetrics
    • Open Science
    • Scientific mobility
  • Publications
  • Teaching
  • CV
    • Bio excerpt
    • Extended CV (pdf)
    • Short CV (pdf)
  • Notes
Self-promotion

Towards more nuanced altmetric methods and indicators

  • April 9, 2019April 17, 2019
  • by Nicolas Robinson-Garcia

We have recently had accepted a paper in FEMS Microbiology Letters in which we develop a methodological framework for the use of altmetrics trying to go beyond counting hits and trying to inform on how and who consumes what scientific literature. Although, not yet published, there is already a postprint version available via ArXiv which can be consulted.

Robinson-Garcia, N., Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D. Mapping social media attention in Microbiology: Identifying main topics and actors. FEMS Microbiology Letters. arXiv:1904.00646v1

We are still refining this framework and will present some interesting updates on this in the ISSI 2019 Conference held in Rome next September. So beware!

Here you can read the abstract as an appetizer

Abstract

This paper aims to map and identify topics of interest within the field of Microbiology and identify the main sources driving such attention. We combine data from Web of Science and Altmetric.com, a platform which retrieves mentions to scientific literature from social media and other non-academic communication outlets. We focus on the dissemination of microbial publications in Twitter, news media and policy briefs. A two-mode network of social accounts shows distinctive areas of activity. We identify a cluster of papers mentioned solely by regional news media. A central area of the network is formed by papers discussed by the three outlets. A large portion of the network is driven by Twitter activity. When analyzing top actors contributing to such network, we observe that more than half of the Twitter accounts are bots, mentioning 32% of the documents in our dataset. Within news media outlets, there is a predominance of popular science outlets. With regard to policy briefs, both international and national bodies are represented. Finally, our topic analysis shows that the thematic focus of papers mentioned varies by outlet. While news media cover the wider range of topics, policy briefs are focused on translational medicine, and bacterial outbreaks.

If reporting p-values is wrong, what is the alternative?
Swamped by rankings
altmetrics news media policy documents social media Twitter

Related articles

Science covers our work on…
Twitter, altmetrics and science communication
Scientific excellence is just one…
International collaboration: It is not…
esss 2017: European Summer School…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nullius in verba

(Not on authority)

Recent Posts

  • The difference between i.e.; e.g., and cf. January 27, 2021
  • Understanding the peer review system January 14, 2021
  • Peer Review II – Elaborando la respuesta a revisores November 27, 2020
  • New research line on COVID-19 and scientific communication June 24, 2020
  • Science covers our work on COVID-19 May 27, 2020

Categories

  • Bibliographies 2
  • Opinion 6
  • Paper notes 4
  • Projects 2
  • SciComm 11
  • Self-promotion 6
  • Uncategorized 1
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
  • Twitter
  • github
  • Flickr
  • LinkedIn
  • Slideshare