Skip to content
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
  • Home
  • Projects
    • LeaDing Fellows-MSCA ECOSCI
    • Bibliometría o Barbarie
    • SCI-COMM COVID-19
  • Research topics
    • Altmetrics
    • Open Science
    • Scientific mobility
  • Publications
  • Teaching
  • CV
    • Bio excerpt
    • Extended CV (pdf)
    • Short CV (pdf)
  • Notes
Opinion

Scientific excellence is just one of the many paths…

  • July 26, 2017April 17, 2019
  • by Nicolas Robinson-Garcia

Recently the LSE Impact blog posted and entry by Richard Woolley and I where we comment on the dangers of trying to link scientific excellence and societal impact. Assessing the societal impact of research is now the big challenge in research evaluation. Until recently, evaluative and policy efforts were placed on promoting the so-called ‘excellent research’, following the logic that it is the best research the one that can lead to social change and respond to current societal challenges. But the UK 2014 REF has been a game-changer by introducing a complex peer review system by which committees assess the impact of submitted case studies in which researchers explain how their research has contributed to society (in which ever terms they find suitable).

The result is a complex system in which quantitative indicators are relegated leaving mixed feelings as to the process followed and its success. Still, it is a worthy initiative and the first attempt to assess the societal impact of research at a national scale. In our post entry, we part from the premise that the assessment made by the committees is acceptable and explore the relationship between the scores received by each submission unit for their scientific output and societal impact. What we find is that such relationship between scientific excellence or quality and societal impact is not always correlated, suggesting that there are many ways of having and impact in society without doing excellent research and the contrary, doing good research does not neccessarily always leads to having a societal impact.

International collaboration: It is not only a matter of with whom but with how many?
Twitter, altmetrics and science communication
scientific excellence societal impact UK REF

Related articles

Science covers our work on…
Swamped by rankings
Towards more nuanced altmetric methods…
Rabietas y pataleos académicos
La financiación de las universidades…
Los resultados del REF2014 del…
Twitter, altmetrics and science communication
International collaboration: It is not…
esss 2017: European Summer School…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nullius in verba

(Not on authority)

Recent Posts

  • Understanding the peer review system January 14, 2021
  • Peer Review II – Elaborando la respuesta a revisores November 27, 2020
  • New research line on COVID-19 and scientific communication June 24, 2020
  • Science covers our work on COVID-19 May 27, 2020
  • “Meaningful Data Counts” project has been granted! May 6, 2020

Categories

  • Bibliographies 2
  • Opinion 6
  • Paper notes 3
  • Projects 2
  • SciComm 10
  • Self-promotion 6
  • Uncategorized 2
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
  • Twitter
  • github
  • Flickr
  • LinkedIn
  • Slideshare