SciComm

Science covers our work on COVID-19

Update 29/05/2020: a printed version of the Science story is now out

A couple of weeks ago we uploaded along with Daniel Torres-Salinas and Pedro A. Castillo-Valdivieso, from the University of Granada a preprint in which we modeled the publication growth and social media attention to COVID-19 papers to make predictions. A specific aspects we considered was the distinction between OA and non-OA publications. This is a work in progress and we hope to deliver some more solid results in the future.

Read more “Science covers our work on COVID-19” →
Opinion

Swamped by rankings

Lately the odds have confronted me with what I thought, was a topic I had left behind: university rankings. Having written my PhD thesis on university rankings, you can imagine how fed up I ended with all this business. Still, the fascination they provoke and the stimulating discussions they lead to (usually criticizing their use) traps me from time to time. While I thought these relapses were anecdotal, funnily, they have concentrated in the last 15 days. First, came the announcement of the release of the 2019 edition of the Leiden Ranking. This year, it includes gender and Open Access indicators. Me being involved in the development of the latter. Then, just a couple of days ago, our paper on Mining university rankings was finally accepted for publication in Research Evaluation and we uploaded an OA version of the manuscript.

Read more “Swamped by rankings” →

Bibliographies

Living bibliography on Open Access

Bachrach, S. (1998, September 4). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:Who Should Own Scientific Papers? Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5382.1459
Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010, June 23). Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. (E. Scalas, Ed.), PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Bohannon, J. (2016, April 28). Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.508
Chawla, D. S. (2017). Unpaywall finds free versions of paywalled papers. Nature.
Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2011, December). Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010, October 18). Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. (R. P. Futrelle, Ed.), PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
Ginsparg, P. (2006, September 20). As We May Read. Journal of Neuroscience. Society for Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3161-06.2006
Ginsparg, Paul. (1997, May). Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village. The Serials Librarian. Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1300/j123v30n03_13
Haque, A., & Ginsparg, P. (2009, November). Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21166
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011, June 13). The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. (M. Hermes-Lima, Ed.), PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20663
Whitfield, J. (2012, February 9). Elsevier boycott gathers pace. Nature. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2012.10010

Read more “Living bibliography on Open Access” →